Dimension: 1.3.1 Rules of procedure
This dimension outlines the specific powers and provisions defined in parliament’s rules of procedure, which codify all procedural aspects of parliamentary business. The rules of procedures should cover all of parliament’s activities, potentially including the following matters:
- The individual actions and conduct of MPs, including the powers and privileges of members of majority and minority parties and groups
- The composition of parliament’s membership
- The conduct of plenary sessions and debates
- The setting of parliament’s agenda
- Ethics and conflicts of interest
- Political activities and funding
- Independent budgetary authorities
- The establishment and operation of committees
- Staffing and the parliamentary administration, including the appointment of a Secretary General Secretary General Typically the most senior permanent officer of parliament, who advises on procedure and records the decisions of the house. This person is also usually the administrative head of the parliamentary administration. In some institutions, the role of Secretary General and the responsibilities listed here may be performed by more than one individual or by several offices of jurisdiction.
In unicameral parliaments, there is only one set of rules of procedure for the entire institution. In bicameral parliaments, each chamber may have separate rules of procedure, reflecting their institutional independence.
Some countries have an overarching legal framework defining the process by which parliament’s actions and mandate are exercised. The rules of procedure should be consistent with the relevant provisions of this legal framework. Parliament Parliament A national body of elected (or sometimes appointed) representatives that makes laws, debates issues and holds the government to account. ’s rules of procedures should be introduced, adopted and amended by parliament alone, and adhered to by all MPs and parliamentary staff.
The rules of procedure should be expressed in plain language that both MPs and the public can easily understand. They should be transparent and publicly available.
The rules of procedure should be implemented and interpreted consistently and impartially. Past practices and interpretations (such as rulings by the Speaker Speaker The highest authority and principal presiding officer of the parliament, or of the house or chamber in bicameral parliaments. The Speaker is usually an MP elected at the beginning of each convocation by fellow MPs to preside over the parliamentary chamber or, in a unicameral system, to preside over the parliament. ) should be documented in guides, handbooks or other documents made available to MPs.
The rules of procedure may be reviewed periodically or on an ongoing basis, and proposals for amendments may be submitted by a relevant committee or other group of MPs representing the composition of parliament.
See also Dimension 1.1.1: Institutional autonomy and Dimension 1.1.2: Procedural autonomy.
Aspiring goal
Assess your parliament against this dimension
Assessment criteria
No 1: Autonomy to set own rules of procedure
Parliament has the authority to independently adopt and amend its rules of procedure.
No 2: Scope
Parliament’s rules of procedure are consistent with the legal framework and codify all procedural aspects of parliamentary business.
No 3: Implementation and interpretation
The rules of procedure are implemented and interpreted consistently. Past practices and interpretations are documented and made available to MPs and the public.
No 4: Revision of the rules
The rules of procedure are subject to periodic review and proposals for amendments by MPs, typically through a procedure committee.
How to complete this assessment
This dimension is assessed against several criteria, each of which should be evaluated separately. For each criterion, select one of the six descriptive grades (Non-existent, Rudimentary, Basic, Good, Very good and Excellent) that best reflects the situation in your parliament, and provide details of the evidence on which this assessment is based.
The evidence for assessment of this dimension could include the following:
- Rules of procedure Rules of procedure The rules approved by parliament to regulate its proceedings and govern the way it conducts its business. adopted and/or amended by parliament alone
- Separate rules of procedure for each chamber in a bicameral parliament
- Guides, handbooks or other documents documenting past practices and interpretations of parliament’s rules of procedure
Where relevant, provide additional comments or examples that support the assessment.
Download this indicatorGet help with this assessment
The assessment of indicators involves diagnosing and considering strengths and weaknesses, i.e. the things parliament is doing well, and the things it could do better or more effectively, taking into account established good practices that are described in the indicators.
Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.
URL copied to clipboard