Dimension: 1.3.5 Quorum
This dimension concerns the requirements for a quorum, or the minimum number of MPs who must be present in order for parliament to validly conduct its business. The existence of a quorum is therefore a practical measure that allows parliament to effectively operate without all MPs being present.
Different countries have different practices in terms of the quorum needed for debate, and the quorum needed for voting for different pieces of legislation. Practice in recent decades shows that many parliaments have lowered or abolished the quorum requirement for debates, while maintaining it for voting on legislation and other acts. Regardless of these variations, a quorum is intended to protect against decision-making by a very small number of MPs.
Quorum rules are typically set out in a country’s legal framework and in a chamber’s rules of procedure. Often, the rules set out a specific time frame from when a “quorum call” is announced to when a quorum must be formed to begin or continue a debate. In some parliaments, MPs can raise a “point of order” to draw attention to a quorum not being present, which forces the Speaker Speaker The highest authority and principal presiding officer of the parliament, or of the house or chamber in bicameral parliaments. The Speaker is usually an MP elected at the beginning of each convocation by fellow MPs to preside over the parliamentary chamber or, in a unicameral system, to preside over the parliament. to call for a quorum to be formed in order that business can continue.
Aspiring goal
Assess your parliament against this dimension
Assessment criteria
No 1: Legal framework
The legal framework defines the minimum number of MPs who must be present in order for parliamentary business to be conducted in the event of a quorum call.
No 2: Right to call for a quorum
Parliament’s rules of procedure define the powers of MPs to request a quorum to verify if the number of MPs present is lower than the minimum needed to conduct parliamentary business.
No 3: Practice
Quorum rules are consistently implemented in practice.
How to complete this assessment
This dimension is assessed against several criteria, each of which should be evaluated separately. For each criterion, select one of the six descriptive grades (Non-existent, Rudimentary, Basic, Good, Very good and Excellent) that best reflects the situation in your parliament, and provide details of the evidence on which this assessment is based.
The evidence for assessment of this dimension could include the following:
- Quorum rules defined in the legal framework and/or the chamber’s rules of procedure
- Records of parliamentary sessions
Where relevant, provide additional comments or examples that support the assessment.
Download this indicatorGet help with this assessment
The assessment of indicators involves diagnosing and considering strengths and weaknesses, i.e. the things parliament is doing well, and the things it could do better or more effectively, taking into account established good practices that are described in the indicators.
Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.
URL copied to clipboard