Dimension: 7.3.2 Composition of committees
This dimension concerns the rules and practice regarding the composition of parliamentary committees, including committee membership and leadership. It is important that MPs should be able to engage in committee work, in accordance with their personal expertise and interests and with the selection and decision-making processes of their political groups. Political groups often play a key role in committee assignments.
Committee Committee See: Parliamentary committee Parliamentary committee A body comprised of MPs who are appointed, on either a temporary or a permanent basis, to debate or closely examine matters closely related to specific policies, issues or circumstances, in line with the committee’s scope of work. The theme, structure and nature of parliamentary committees are established by a chamber’s rules of procedure. Depending on the these rules, the composition of a committee may reflect that of the whole parliament or include diverse party representation. In some parliaments, the term “commission” is used instead of, or interchangeably with, “committee”. . membership is usually determined at the start of a parliamentary term. Generally, the composition of committees is proportionate to that of parliament as a whole. While there is considerable variation in committee structures, parliaments often require each MP to sit on at least one committee. Many parliaments allow MPs to be members of more than one committee, whereas some parliaments limit the number of committees on which each MP can sit.
Committee Committee See: Parliamentary committee Parliamentary committee A body comprised of MPs who are appointed, on either a temporary or a permanent basis, to debate or closely examine matters closely related to specific policies, issues or circumstances, in line with the committee’s scope of work. The theme, structure and nature of parliamentary committees are established by a chamber’s rules of procedure. Depending on the these rules, the composition of a committee may reflect that of the whole parliament or include diverse party representation. In some parliaments, the term “commission” is used instead of, or interchangeably with, “committee”. . leadership roles – chairs and vice-chairs – are often elected by and from committee members after the composition of the committee is determined, soon after the first meeting of the newly elected parliament. In some systems, the majority party obtains chair positions for all committees, while in others, committee leadership positions are distributed among political groups based on the principle of proportionality.
Regardless of the system, it is important for parliament to establish and apply clear, fair and transparent rules and procedures for the composition of committees and the selection or election of committee leadership positions.
Parliament
Parliament
A national body of elected (or sometimes appointed) representatives that makes laws, debates issues and holds the government to account.
’s rules of procedure often explicitly assign leadership of some committees – such as the budget committee or the human rights committee – to the opposition.
Special consideration may be given to small political groups and independent MPs to ensure their representation in committees, either as full members or as observers.
Aspiring goal
Assess your parliament against this dimension
Assessment criteria
No 1: Rules and procedures for composition of committees
There are clear, fair and transparent rules and procedures for determining membership of committees and for the selection or election of committee leadership roles.
No 2: Small political groups and independent MPs
Special consideration is given to small political groups and independent MPs in order to ensure their representation in committees.
No 3: Expertise and interests of MPs
The expertise and interests of MPs are taken into consideration when assigning committee roles.
No 4: Practice
In practice, the composition of committees and committee leadership roles reflects that of parliament as a whole.
How to complete this assessment
This dimension is assessed against several criteria, each of which should be evaluated separately. For each criterion, select one of the six descriptive grades (Non-existent, Rudimentary, Basic, Good, Very good and Excellent) that best reflects the situation in your parliament, and provide details of the evidence on which this assessment is based.
The evidence for assessment of this dimension could include the following:
- Provisions of the legal framework governing the composition and leadership of parliamentary committees
- Provisions of parliament’s rules of procedure relating to the distribution of committee leadership positions among political groups
- The number of committees or subcommittees chaired by opposition MPs
Where relevant, provide additional comments or examples that support the assessment.
Download this indicatorGet help with this assessment
The assessment of indicators involves diagnosing and considering strengths and weaknesses, i.e. the things parliament is doing well, and the things it could do better or more effectively, taking into account established good practices that are described in the indicators.
Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.
URL copied to clipboard